Evaluation of final logotype and design boards

From the final outcome of my design boards, showing my chosen logotype in context and how my ideas of logotypes developed, it was clear that I didn't execute the ideas as I would have liked and should have been. The logotype I thought worked well and had an element that could be used in context in different ways effectively.

the critique given to my design boards were:

-the logotype looks a bit basic at first but when in context it thrives

- The mockup looks like an actual website 

- effective how the logo surrounds the whole page - the colour doesn't need to be there 

- designs and contextual part are really good but lacks in the writing aspect x2
- explanation needs more development
- idea of using acetate could overlay
- strong and thorough development shown with tackling the same theme from a different angle
- the development of my logotype into a collection of shapes is effective - animation
- needs more cragg research
- more in context images
- not enough attention been given to type manipulation

With looking back at the final outcome, I would have took more time to develop the initial ideas, as a few were weak with me finding the task more difficult then would have liked. Also, to allow more time to put the final logotype into context to excel my design further, really displaying my concept.